BasketballStatistics.com  Innovative Stats and Analysis  




by Jon Nichols A second concern about my point guard study (http://basketballstatistics.com/howtheshootingabilitiesofpointguardsaffectoffenses.html), besides the complications of true shot percentage (http://basketballstatistics.com/tryingtounderstandthepointguardresultsparti.html), is the possibility that the relationship between threepoint shooting in point guards and increased team Offensive Ratings is a matter of correlation and not causation. Perhaps, the theory goes, a point guard shoots a high percentage from long distance because the team is good at offense, rather than his threepoint shooting being a reason why the offense is successful. There are number of ways to get some clues to see if this is a problem. A simple method that I have chosen is using the point guards’ career threepoint percentages rather than the current season’s percentages. The career percentage should be a more accurate indicator of whether or not the player is truly a good shooter from long range and not just a product of offense. Of course, if a player has spent his entire career with one team the results may be less useful, but nevertheless we push forward:
As you can see, instead of using the cutoff points of 30% and 40%, I changed them to 32% and 38%. I did this because there are fewer players that have career percentages as extreme. 22.73% of home lineups featured a point guard with a career threepoint percentage greater than 38%, and 33.95% featured a player with a percentage lower than 32%. On the road, those numbers were 23.06% and 34.07%, respectively. The results are practically identical to those of the original study. I think we can safely say that using career threepoint percentage instead of current percentage does not really make a difference.
Copyright © 2009 BasketballStatistics.com 
